<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for iorgforum.org Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iorgforum.org/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog</link>
	<description>IORG members post on information overload topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:03:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on More from IO summit in London by Lesa Becker PhD</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/11/16/39/comment-page-1/#comment-25342</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesa Becker PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/?p=39#comment-25342</guid>
		<description>I agree information overload is about management - don&#039;t we wish there was a technological solution to the problem!  When I completed my dissertation on information overload, my study participants concluded the organizational environment was the chief contributor to IO.

They recommended a more disciplined approach to managing information, communication, priorities, projects and decision making in organizations. The solution is as multidimensional as the problem.  

Maybe CIO&#039;s should become chief intellectual capacity officers since the limiting factor is the human capacity to process information. We owe it to the people in our organizations to manage this problem before they short circuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree information overload is about management &#8211; don&#8217;t we wish there was a technological solution to the problem!  When I completed my dissertation on information overload, my study participants concluded the organizational environment was the chief contributor to IO.</p>
<p>They recommended a more disciplined approach to managing information, communication, priorities, projects and decision making in organizations. The solution is as multidimensional as the problem.  </p>
<p>Maybe CIO&#8217;s should become chief intellectual capacity officers since the limiting factor is the human capacity to process information. We owe it to the people in our organizations to manage this problem before they short circuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IO in a call center environment by dhanesh</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2008/11/26/information-overlaod-in-a-call-center-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-22486</link>
		<dc:creator>dhanesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2008/11/26/information-overlaod-in-a-call-center-environment/#comment-22486</guid>
		<description>Awesome idea!!!
Made me think harder on &quot;How can we extend this idea to knowledge worker corporate environment&quot;
thanks..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome idea!!!<br />
Made me think harder on &#8220;How can we extend this idea to knowledge worker corporate environment&#8221;<br />
thanks..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is RSS part of the problem or part of the solution? by Pete Weiss</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/01/05/is-rss-part-of-the-problem-or-part-of-the-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-21471</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/01/05/is-rss-part-of-the-problem-or-part-of-the-solution/#comment-21471</guid>
		<description>Sometimes RSS can be used to offload e-mail subscriptions freeing up your inbox.

Someone once said that if you read all of your RSS feeds then you are subscribed to too few ;-)

RSS feeds require their own management e.g., links move, no longer are supported, no longer are useful, or contain non-parsable data.  Reporting source problems can be challenging.

Some sites do not provide RSS feeds, but they should.  

Some RSS sites allow you to slice and dice and simply focus on specific topics or tags (including THIS site).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes RSS can be used to offload e-mail subscriptions freeing up your inbox.</p>
<p>Someone once said that if you read all of your RSS feeds then you are subscribed to too few <img src='http://iorgforum.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>RSS feeds require their own management e.g., links move, no longer are supported, no longer are useful, or contain non-parsable data.  Reporting source problems can be challenging.</p>
<p>Some sites do not provide RSS feeds, but they should.  </p>
<p>Some RSS sites allow you to slice and dice and simply focus on specific topics or tags (including THIS site).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Calculating Information Overload &#8211; Find Out Your Organization&#8217;s Cost by Pankaj</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/01/13/calculating-information-overload-find-out-your-organizations-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-12804</link>
		<dc:creator>Pankaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/01/13/calculating-information-overload-find-out-your-organizations-cost/#comment-12804</guid>
		<description>we had recently done a white paper on management of the email deluge. much of the problem stems from using email for &quot;collaborative purposes&quot; - a boss delegating tasks and asking for updates, collaboration on files, managing schedules. a single mail causes a torrent, and youre forever digging through your inbox. 

email is a &quot;push&quot; medium, and you constantly feel like you&#039;re being poked in your ribs to go check your mail.  shifting to &quot;pull&quot; collaboration tools (document management, task management, forums) not only relieves the email glut, but also smoothen information management in the organization, and the effectiveness of teams working together. 

you can see the white paper at - http://www.hyperoffice.com/business-email-overload/

we also have a guest speaker, tech expert James Gaskin from networkworld.com and itworld.com presenting a webinar on the subject on the 28th of May at 2PM EST</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we had recently done a white paper on management of the email deluge. much of the problem stems from using email for &#8220;collaborative purposes&#8221; &#8211; a boss delegating tasks and asking for updates, collaboration on files, managing schedules. a single mail causes a torrent, and youre forever digging through your inbox. </p>
<p>email is a &#8220;push&#8221; medium, and you constantly feel like you&#8217;re being poked in your ribs to go check your mail.  shifting to &#8220;pull&#8221; collaboration tools (document management, task management, forums) not only relieves the email glut, but also smoothen information management in the organization, and the effectiveness of teams working together. </p>
<p>you can see the white paper at &#8211; <a href="http://www.hyperoffice.com/business-email-overload/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hyperoffice.com/business-email-overload/</a></p>
<p>we also have a guest speaker, tech expert James Gaskin from networkworld.com and itworld.com presenting a webinar on the subject on the 28th of May at 2PM EST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good and Bad Multitasking? by Kevin Arthur</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/05/19/good-and-bad-multitasking/comment-page-1/#comment-12741</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/05/19/good-and-bad-multitasking/#comment-12741</guid>
		<description>His concept sounds a bit like Linda Stone&#039;s &quot;Continuous Partial Attention.&quot; It makes some sense, and I think it&#039;s probably true that people switch between tasks a lot more frequently than they used to, but it seems like we&#039;re not recognizing the cost.

Somebody should do a study and see whether those students who google stuff during lectures do any better or worse than a student who googles afterwards. Or whether people gain anything from tweeting during a conference talk. If it&#039;s a boring lecture and you don&#039;t care about it then sure, you&#039;re accomplishing more if you do something else instead, but you&#039;re not getting as much from the lecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His concept sounds a bit like Linda Stone&#8217;s &#8220;Continuous Partial Attention.&#8221; It makes some sense, and I think it&#8217;s probably true that people switch between tasks a lot more frequently than they used to, but it seems like we&#8217;re not recognizing the cost.</p>
<p>Somebody should do a study and see whether those students who google stuff during lectures do any better or worse than a student who googles afterwards. Or whether people gain anything from tweeting during a conference talk. If it&#8217;s a boring lecture and you don&#8217;t care about it then sure, you&#8217;re accomplishing more if you do something else instead, but you&#8217;re not getting as much from the lecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting idea from IBM by PPT</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/04/08/interesting-idea-from-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-9031</link>
		<dc:creator>PPT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/04/08/interesting-idea-from-ibm/#comment-9031</guid>
		<description>You are right Nathan!
Daily Tech&#039;s take on this announcement is interesting but then again to quote the late great Walt Kelly&#039;s Pogo-

&quot;Yep, son, we have met the enemy and he is us.&quot;

ppt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right Nathan!<br />
Daily Tech&#8217;s take on this announcement is interesting but then again to quote the late great Walt Kelly&#8217;s Pogo-</p>
<p>&#8220;Yep, son, we have met the enemy and he is us.&#8221;</p>
<p>ppt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EOM now recognized by Gmail! by reinvention</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2008/10/17/now-recognized-by-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-6181</link>
		<dc:creator>reinvention</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2008/10/17/now-recognized-by-gmail/#comment-6181</guid>
		<description>Funny, I reinvented this (and am the only one, as far as I can tell, in a 75000 people strong organization) by adding NMF at the end of my subjects if &#039;No Message Follows&quot; - then in the body of the email I put &quot;no Message Follows&quot; so that the recipient gets it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I reinvented this (and am the only one, as far as I can tell, in a 75000 people strong organization) by adding NMF at the end of my subjects if &#8216;No Message Follows&#8221; &#8211; then in the body of the email I put &#8220;no Message Follows&#8221; so that the recipient gets it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That pesky RTA button&#8230; by Elana</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/comment-page-1/#comment-6092</link>
		<dc:creator>Elana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/#comment-6092</guid>
		<description>But if you take away reply all, you take away the entertainment of seeing how many people reply all and don&#039;t get why they &#039;keep getting all these replies&#039;. The first time I saw this I laughed so hard I cried!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if you take away reply all, you take away the entertainment of seeing how many people reply all and don&#8217;t get why they &#8216;keep getting all these replies&#8217;. The first time I saw this I laughed so hard I cried!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That pesky RTA button&#8230; by PPT</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/comment-page-1/#comment-5564</link>
		<dc:creator>PPT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/#comment-5564</guid>
		<description>Tracy -  Since the beginning days of Outlook I have been asking the same question:

&quot;Why, oh why, hasn’t Microsoft improved Outlook&quot; 
 
I have been avid user of the &quot;rules and alerts&quot; function since I first started using Outlook about 10 years ago.  I too have been waiting for Microsoft to improve this area of Outlook.  If rules could still be prioritized so that only one copy of an email would be directed to a folder instead of multiple copies to multiple folders it would greatly improve workflow.  To take it one step further, if these rules could be established on an enterprise level then best practices could be more easily implemented.

Of course, I am still trying to teach people to use text only email formats (background can triple the size of your emails).  Then again I&#039;m also still trying to teach people to not put spaces in their file names.  That way they can send a &quot;clickable&quot; link allowing the recipient to view a current copy of the information rather than sending out multiple copies of a static document.

Depending on your perspective, it may be encouraging or discouraging to know that I do tech support and web development for a K12 district!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracy &#8211;  Since the beginning days of Outlook I have been asking the same question:</p>
<p>&#8220;Why, oh why, hasn’t Microsoft improved Outlook&#8221; </p>
<p>I have been avid user of the &#8220;rules and alerts&#8221; function since I first started using Outlook about 10 years ago.  I too have been waiting for Microsoft to improve this area of Outlook.  If rules could still be prioritized so that only one copy of an email would be directed to a folder instead of multiple copies to multiple folders it would greatly improve workflow.  To take it one step further, if these rules could be established on an enterprise level then best practices could be more easily implemented.</p>
<p>Of course, I am still trying to teach people to use text only email formats (background can triple the size of your emails).  Then again I&#8217;m also still trying to teach people to not put spaces in their file names.  That way they can send a &#8220;clickable&#8221; link allowing the recipient to view a current copy of the information rather than sending out multiple copies of a static document.</p>
<p>Depending on your perspective, it may be encouraging or discouraging to know that I do tech support and web development for a K12 district!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That pesky RTA button&#8230; by Lesa Becker</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/comment-page-1/#comment-4973</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesa Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/#comment-4973</guid>
		<description>I have just completed my dissertation on the Impact of Information on Organizational Leaders and the managers in my study would give two thumbs up for eliminating the &quot;Reply to All&quot; button on email.  That is one of 34 recommendations my study group had for curbing Information Overload.

I call it a &quot;band aid on a broken leg&quot; recommendation.  The deeper issue is too many organizational priorities, too many poorly run meetings, unclear desision making processes, lack of adequate project management tools, software that shifts clerical work to managers...I won&#039;t go on.  I look forward to sharing the results of my research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just completed my dissertation on the Impact of Information on Organizational Leaders and the managers in my study would give two thumbs up for eliminating the &#8220;Reply to All&#8221; button on email.  That is one of 34 recommendations my study group had for curbing Information Overload.</p>
<p>I call it a &#8220;band aid on a broken leg&#8221; recommendation.  The deeper issue is too many organizational priorities, too many poorly run meetings, unclear desision making processes, lack of adequate project management tools, software that shifts clerical work to managers&#8230;I won&#8217;t go on.  I look forward to sharing the results of my research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
