<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That pesky RTA button&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iorgforum.org/blog/index.php/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/</link>
	<description>IORG members post on information overload topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:03:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elana</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/comment-page-1/#comment-6092</link>
		<dc:creator>Elana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/#comment-6092</guid>
		<description>But if you take away reply all, you take away the entertainment of seeing how many people reply all and don&#039;t get why they &#039;keep getting all these replies&#039;. The first time I saw this I laughed so hard I cried!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if you take away reply all, you take away the entertainment of seeing how many people reply all and don&#8217;t get why they &#8216;keep getting all these replies&#8217;. The first time I saw this I laughed so hard I cried!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPT</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/comment-page-1/#comment-5564</link>
		<dc:creator>PPT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/#comment-5564</guid>
		<description>Tracy -  Since the beginning days of Outlook I have been asking the same question:

&quot;Why, oh why, hasn’t Microsoft improved Outlook&quot; 
 
I have been avid user of the &quot;rules and alerts&quot; function since I first started using Outlook about 10 years ago.  I too have been waiting for Microsoft to improve this area of Outlook.  If rules could still be prioritized so that only one copy of an email would be directed to a folder instead of multiple copies to multiple folders it would greatly improve workflow.  To take it one step further, if these rules could be established on an enterprise level then best practices could be more easily implemented.

Of course, I am still trying to teach people to use text only email formats (background can triple the size of your emails).  Then again I&#039;m also still trying to teach people to not put spaces in their file names.  That way they can send a &quot;clickable&quot; link allowing the recipient to view a current copy of the information rather than sending out multiple copies of a static document.

Depending on your perspective, it may be encouraging or discouraging to know that I do tech support and web development for a K12 district!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracy &#8211;  Since the beginning days of Outlook I have been asking the same question:</p>
<p>&#8220;Why, oh why, hasn’t Microsoft improved Outlook&#8221; </p>
<p>I have been avid user of the &#8220;rules and alerts&#8221; function since I first started using Outlook about 10 years ago.  I too have been waiting for Microsoft to improve this area of Outlook.  If rules could still be prioritized so that only one copy of an email would be directed to a folder instead of multiple copies to multiple folders it would greatly improve workflow.  To take it one step further, if these rules could be established on an enterprise level then best practices could be more easily implemented.</p>
<p>Of course, I am still trying to teach people to use text only email formats (background can triple the size of your emails).  Then again I&#8217;m also still trying to teach people to not put spaces in their file names.  That way they can send a &#8220;clickable&#8221; link allowing the recipient to view a current copy of the information rather than sending out multiple copies of a static document.</p>
<p>Depending on your perspective, it may be encouraging or discouraging to know that I do tech support and web development for a K12 district!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesa Becker</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/comment-page-1/#comment-4973</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesa Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/#comment-4973</guid>
		<description>I have just completed my dissertation on the Impact of Information on Organizational Leaders and the managers in my study would give two thumbs up for eliminating the &quot;Reply to All&quot; button on email.  That is one of 34 recommendations my study group had for curbing Information Overload.

I call it a &quot;band aid on a broken leg&quot; recommendation.  The deeper issue is too many organizational priorities, too many poorly run meetings, unclear desision making processes, lack of adequate project management tools, software that shifts clerical work to managers...I won&#039;t go on.  I look forward to sharing the results of my research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just completed my dissertation on the Impact of Information on Organizational Leaders and the managers in my study would give two thumbs up for eliminating the &#8220;Reply to All&#8221; button on email.  That is one of 34 recommendations my study group had for curbing Information Overload.</p>
<p>I call it a &#8220;band aid on a broken leg&#8221; recommendation.  The deeper issue is too many organizational priorities, too many poorly run meetings, unclear desision making processes, lack of adequate project management tools, software that shifts clerical work to managers&#8230;I won&#8217;t go on.  I look forward to sharing the results of my research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Allison Altman</title>
		<link>http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/comment-page-1/#comment-4930</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Allison Altman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iorgforum.org/blog/2009/02/02/that-pesky-rta-button/#comment-4930</guid>
		<description>Nathan, The comments on TechCrunch are interesting -- and these are coming from a relatively tech-savvy population. (Blog comments are indeed a strong reminder that information overload is a problem waiting to be solved!) Rarely am I in a situation where Reply All is an appropriate response to an email.
I liked the comment saying &quot;mail systems should be smarter then to enable &#039;reply to all&#039; after a company wide email… or even a warning like &#039;you are going to send this mail to x people, are you really sure you want to reply to all&#039;&quot;. Why, oh why, hasn&#039;t Microsoft improved Outlook to provide this type of functionality?
I imagine many of us in IORG have attempted to model good email behavior -- but I am often frustrated with the lack of improvement. I&#039;m currently involved with a group desperately in need of email etiquette and workflow process -- but how do I point out possible changes without offending these folks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, The comments on TechCrunch are interesting &#8212; and these are coming from a relatively tech-savvy population. (Blog comments are indeed a strong reminder that information overload is a problem waiting to be solved!) Rarely am I in a situation where Reply All is an appropriate response to an email.<br />
I liked the comment saying &#8220;mail systems should be smarter then to enable &#8216;reply to all&#8217; after a company wide email… or even a warning like &#8216;you are going to send this mail to x people, are you really sure you want to reply to all&#8217;&#8221;. Why, oh why, hasn&#8217;t Microsoft improved Outlook to provide this type of functionality?<br />
I imagine many of us in IORG have attempted to model good email behavior &#8212; but I am often frustrated with the lack of improvement. I&#8217;m currently involved with a group desperately in need of email etiquette and workflow process &#8212; but how do I point out possible changes without offending these folks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
